26
Jul

English Version: Chandra Singh Garhwali : A champion that promoted communal harmony during the Indian freedom struggle

I - Day 2018 Home page Original Hindi Version

Chandra Singh Garhwali was a soldier in the British army and a hero of the Indian freedom struggle. His refusal to fire on unarmed, peaceful civilians averted a massacre and sparked off the Peshawar revolt of 1930. This important freedom fighter continued to work against caste and communal oppression after India’s independence. In spite of all his work and sacrifice for the people of this country, he died in poverty, with the bravery of his deeds unrecognized by the governments of India and Uttar Pradesh, and historians of independent India.

Chandra Singh Garhwali : A champion that promoted communal harmony during the Indian freedom struggle

Written by Vidya Bhushan Rawat and translated by Karthik Sekhar

October 1 marks the death anniversary of Chandra Singh Garhwali, who is remembered as the hero of the Peshawar revolt. Sadly, however, outside of remembering him nominally, little is knowledge about his life is available through official archives, and he earned little by way of official recognition. This is unsurprising, as he was a lifelong opponent of power and authority. Chandra Singh was born in 1891 in the Garhwal region. Growing up, he had witnessed and experienced poverty and marginalization among the people who lived in the mountains. He joined the military at age 21, which was common among the youth of the mountain communities. He fought in the British army during the second World War. He was a member of the Arya Samaj and was deeply influenced by Gandhian thought, but his own thoughts and actions went far beyond these institutions. Although he was part of the military, he was a strong believer in democracy. He strongly supported and fought for communal harmony, and in an era of increasing communalization of the military, administration and media, his life and work is a important story that needs to be told.

He was a leader of the Garhwal rifle regiment that revolted by refusing to open fire on a group of unarmed Pathans who were resisting the British rule using non-violent means, thereby preventing another massacre on the scale of Jallianwalla Bagh. Chandra Singh’s role in this significant revolt is largely forgotten by both historians and politicians, largely due to his revolutionary ideals. In this regard, we are indebted to the great historian Rahul Sankrityayan who in 1955 penned a biography of Chandra Singh Garhwali published by Kitabmahal Publishing House. I had heard of Garhwali’s legend as a child, as he belonged to a village neighboring the one where I grew up. But I realized his importance or greatness only when I read Sankrityayan’s biography. Sankrityayan’s work, which contains rare details of Garhwali’s life, is a significant contribution to Indian history and is especially important during a time when historical research has become a vehicle for propaganda. It isshameful that during their lifetime, eminent politicians like Govind Vallabh Pant did not honor a patriot like Chandra Singh Garhwali or acknowledge the sacrifices made by the latter as a freedom fighter. Rather, despite many years passing since Independence Chandra Singh Garhwali was treated as a criminal for his leadership of the revolt against the British.  

The Peshawar revolt of 1930

This was the period during which the leader of the Pathans in the Northwest Frontier Province (now part of Pakistan), Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan (also known as Badhshah Khan) was leading the non-violent resistance movement organized by Mahatma Gandhi. Under the leadership of Badshah Khan, the Pathans had extended their support to the Indian National Congress, and this act of solidarity was unacceptable to the British. To crush this resistance, the British selected a military regiment that did not belong to the area, hoping that the soldiers would follow orders of crushing the Pathan revolters without any compunctions. Even today, this is a common strategy deployed by the Indian government – hoping that a lack of linguistic or cultural commonality between soldiers and a local population will ensure that soldiers suppress dissent in a ruthless way. This was the hope when the British sent the Garhwal regiment to Peshawar and Abbotabad to crush the Pathan revolt.

Sankrityayan describes the Peshawar revolt of 1930 in his book as follows,

“On 23rd April 1930, the office bearers of the company and the soldiers were ordered, ‘Organize within 5 minutes. Rifles, ammunition and military vehicles were kept ready. The cooks were ordered to prepare food within one hour’. The next morning Captain Ricket gave orders to the Garhwali Battalion to advance. Brave pathans were surrounding the four sides of the national flag. A Sikh leader was passionately addressing the crowd from a dais, alternating between Pashtun and Urdu. The crowd was chanting: `Allah ho Akbar. Victory to Mahatma Gandhi.’

Captain Ricket addressed the crowd, `All of you should disperse, else you will be killed by bullets.’The Pathans were unperturbed by the threat. Bullets and violence were not alien to them. Captain Ricket then turned to the soldiers to fire three rounds. Chandra Singh was standing to Ricket’s left. He shouted loudly to his regiment, `Garhwalis, cease fire! Garhwali, do not fire.’ As soon as the Garhwali soldiers heard Chandra Singh, they retracted their rifles and stood them on the ground. It hardly needs to be said that the soldiers were faithful to their country. One soldier, Uday Singh, gave his rife to a Pathan and said : `Here brother, now you can shoot us.’ Soon, all soldiers of Platoons 1 and 2 placed their rifles on the ground. At this time, Luthi Singh, the commander of Platoon 3 did not accept this and ordered his platoon to open fire and himself started firing. But members of his platoon refused to follow his orders, and stood their ground. When Captain Ricket demanded asked Chandra Singh what the matter was, Chandra Singh replied ‘These people are unarmed. How can be fire on them?’ This refusal from the soldiers led the British to send their own platoon, which opened fire, killing many people, which enraged the Pathans. This resulted in chaos, and in the resulting melee Captain Ricket was killed. Chandra Singh and his colleagues somehow escaped without harm.”

(Excerpt from Sankrityayan’s biography of Chandra Singh Garhwali)

Peshawar was boiling. All the revolting soldiers escaped harm and returned from the town center to their barracks, where they were arrested. Chandra Singh was sent to the jail in Abbotabad, where he was imprisoned for nearly 14 years. The notable aspect of this revolt was that it stemmed from patriotism and a feeling of solidarity between the soldiers and the local population. Peshawar was a foreign place for Chandra Singh and his colleagues. They did not even have a place to escape, as the Northwest frontier was an alien land where neither the language nor the food was familiar. Most of the soldiers were Hindu, and not educated beyond middle school. Despite these differences, they set an example of solidarity and patriotism that transcended the boundaries of religion. Most of these soldiers came from the eastern Himalayan mountains where there were very few Muslims, yet they took a principled stand of refusing to bring harm to their fellow people, and where they had no surety that anyone would advocate in support of their revolt. This act of bravery represents a shining example in the legacy of India’s freedom movement, and yet this has been reduced to the margins by historians.

Life in Independent India

Independent India did not fully embrace Chandra Singh, and he kept wandering. All his colleagues were sentenced to Kaala Paani (a notorious prison in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands), to face terrible injustice there, and did not get any recognition after their release from there. Post release from prison, Chandra Singh became engaged in social activism and politics in Uttarakhand, but never successfully won an election. He disliked the Congress and fought an election under a ticket from the Communist party, but could not win. Why would the people not want a leader like him? If one hears his revolutionary thoughts, it becomes clear why casteist parties and politicians did not embrace him. He had this to say about Dalits in Uttarakhand –

“The caste system has kept a fourth of this country’s population under oppression for millenia. These people will never rise up until this system is burned from inside out and reduced to ashes, and this can only happen through by replacing it with better education and empowerment.”

Chandra Singh wanted to increase the rights of the Dalits in Uttarakhand by ending the Zamindari system, increasing land reforms to grant entitlements of agricultural and forest lands to dalits, proportional reservations in jobs, free and compulsory education, proportional reservation of seats in councils and assemblies, and in industries.”

(Excerpt from Sankrityayan’s biography of Chandra Singh Garhwali)

Is it then surprising that a person with revolutionary thoughts like this would be immediately eschewed by Savarna politicians like Govind Ballabh Pant and others? Chandra Singh Garhwali remained in poverty through his life. He lived with the pain that the heroes of the Peshawar revolt were never appropriately honored by the governments of either Uttar Pradesh or India.

“On 20th September 1954, Garhwali wrote to the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, where he described his financial situation and sought support. The hut where he lived was severely damaged by the rain, and his monthly income was a year 16 Rupees from his pension fund. He had a debt of nearly 14,000 rupees. He did not even possess utensils to eat his meals. He appealed to the government for help. Nearly after a year on 25th July 1955, the UP government sent him an enthusiastic letter stating that it had increased his pension by a princely sum of 14 Rupees per month for his lifetime.”

(Excerpt from Sankrityayan’s biography of Chandra Singh Garhwali)

It’s a matter of great shame that the government valued Garhwali’s contributions to the freedom struggle at no more than 14 rupees a month. This is but one example of how many freedom fighters were treated post independence. On October 1, 1971 Chandra Singh Garhwali passed away in penury. It is a sad irony that in this age of glitter and showmanship, Garhwali’s life and contributions are referenced by casteist politicians and campaigners in their speeches, without any understanding of the ideals and values he stood for. But we call on the people of India to remember justly this hero of the Peshawar revolt and a lifelong champion of communal harmony and solidarity.  

Vidya Bhushan Rawat is a social activist and writer who has been working directly with the marginalized communities in India for the last 25 years.

You are donating to : Association for India's Development

How much would you like to donate?
$10 $20 $30
Would you like to make regular donations? I would like to make donation(s)
How many times would you like this to recur? (including this payment) *
Name *
Last Name *
Email *
Phone
Address
Additional Note
paypalstripe
Loading...